…………………………………………………

From the Page to the Screen – The Dead Zone

The Dead Zone is a 1979 thriller book written by author Stephen King. It is far from his greatest achievements, but still this is a very underappreciated, strong novel which is consistently involving to read and particularly effective in its tension and original, memorable plot. So let’s compare the book to its cinematic adaptation.

THE FILM ADAPTATION

The film was released in 1983. It was directed by David Cronenberg and it stared Christopher Walken. It did not do particularly well at the box office, but it did receive very good reviews and is now considered to be one of the best Stephen King adaptations. I myself find the film solid, but definitely far from great.

PLOT

The story in the novel is simply terrific. Very groundbreaking in terms of originality in its concept. The book is a riveting read how fun the story is and how consistently thrilling and dangerous the stakes are. But because it is very episodic in nature, the movie thus suffered as it feels incomplete, incredibly rushed and very poorly adapted. It was better fit for television.

WINNER – BOOK

CHARACTERIZATION

I actually like the protagonist in the film and Greg Stillson is particularly effective in the movie version as well. But that’s about it. The rest are pale versions of their much superior book counterparts and because the film is so rushed and short in runtime, the characterization seriously suffered as a result.

WINNER – BOOK

…………………………………………………

…………………………………………………

EMOTION

This is also a big win for the book. Now the film has its fine moving moments, but it is mostly too cold and never as emotional as the novel is. In the novel, we get a particularly resonant and tragic romance, but in the film that was unfortunately shortchanged for more action.

WINNER – BOOK

THEMES

The book is obviously not particularly deep or thematically rich. But at least it features a particularly interesting, somewhat realistic approach and exploration of the concept of premonition and precognition. The film fails in that regard as the dialogue is not as strong.

WINNER – BOOK

TECHNICAL ASPECTS

Now the book is very well written and with terrific pacing and imagery. However, the movie succeeds in bringing that imagery to the big screen in a more immersive manner. The visual effects are sparingly used and those premonition sequences are incredibly powerful how interestingly executed and filmed they are. Very intense and thus this is the only segment where the film takes the win.

WINNER – FILM

BOOK 4: FILM 1

Despite the movie’s obviously excellent technical aspects, solid acting and some powerful sequences, the book is by far a better story which is much richer in terms of subplots, much better developed in its characters and infinitely more affecting in its tone. The film is still pretty solid, but mostly a disappointing, messy affair.